When AI Handles the Task but Not the Strategy: A Lesson Plan for Marketing Students

When AI Handles the Task but Not the Strategy: A Lesson Plan for Marketing Students

Hook: Students and teachers—if you feel like AI is doing all the heavy lifting but the class still struggles with the “why,” you’re watching the same gap B2B marketers see in 2026: AI is excellent at execution, but strategy remains human work. This classroom exercise trains students to use AI tools for campaign execution, then craft, justify and defend the underlying strategy manually.

Why this matters in 2026

By late 2025 and into 2026, industry reports and journalism make a clear point: AI has become the workplace’s productivity engine. Move Forward Strategies’ 2026 State of AI and B2B Marketing found that roughly 78% of marketing leaders view AI primarily as a task and productivity tool, with over half flagging tactical execution as the highest-value use case. Yet only a sliver—about 6%—trust AI to weigh in on brand positioning. In short: the market expects machines to execute; humans must still think.

“Most B2B marketers are leaning into AI for the things it does best right now: execution and efficiency.” — MarTech, Jan 2026

For educators preparing the next generation of B2B marketers, this is an opportunity: teach students to exploit AI’s strengths while sharpening human strategy skills that employers will pay for.

Learning objectives

• Apply AI tools for rapid campaign execution (copy, emails, creative briefs, landing pages).
• Manually develop a marketing strategy (positioning, buyer personas, KPIs, channel mix) that aligns with AI outputs.
• Critically evaluate AI-generated assets for bias, accuracy and fit with strategic goals.
• Defend strategic choices using evidence, logic and a clear measurement plan.

The central classroom exercise — overview

Students work in small teams on a simulated B2B client brief. Each team uses AI tools to execute tactical artifacts, then pauses to create and defend the strategy manually. The final deliverable: a strategic plan and a 10–15 minute defense where teams explain why they chose their position, channel mix and KPIs—and how AI outputs fit into that strategy.

Why mirror B2B practice?

B2B marketing teams already treat AI as a productivity layer. Teaching students to replicate this workflow prepares them for current jobs where they’ll be expected to produce AI-assisted deliverables while owning higher-level thinking.

Classroom timeline (3-week module)

1. Week 0 — Prep (Instructor)
   • Create 2–4 B2B client briefs across industries (SaaS, manufacturing, professional services).
   • Set up accounts for approved AI tools and sandbox data (LLM, image generator, A/B copy generator).
2. Week 1 — Orientation & AI execution sprint
   • Lecture: state of AI in marketing (2025–26 trends, limitations, ethics).
   • Students select briefs and form teams (3–4 students).
   • Execution sprint (hands-on): use AI to create email sequences, social ads, landing page copy and an initial creative brief.
3. Week 2 — Strategy development (human-first)
   • Teams craft positioning, buyer personas, buyer journey mapping and KPI frameworks—without asking AI to choose the strategy.
   • Instructor-led clinics to stress-test assumptions and measurement plans.
4. Week 3 — Integration & defense
   • Teams integrate AI-executed assets with their strategy and prepare a 10–15 minute defense presentation.
   • Peer review and a panel of guest judges (industry practitioners) provide feedback.

Materials and tools

• Access to at least one major LLM platform and an image/creative generator.
• Shared document templates: creative brief, persona worksheet, measurement plan, slide deck template.
• AI prompt log (students record every prompt and model output for review).

Step-by-step classroom activity

1) The AI execution sprint (2–3 class hours)

Goal: convert strategic inputs into tactical outputs quickly so teams can focus on strategy.

• Task students to generate: three email subject lines + sequences, two social ad variants per channel, a proposed landing page hero section, and a 200-word creative brief for designers.
• Provide constrained prompts (examples below) and insist on a prompt log.
• Teach guardrails: temperature control, specificity, token limits, and instruct students to ask for citations where relevant.

2) Strategy creation (4–6 class hours + outside work)

Goal: build a defensible strategy that would guide a B2B marketing operation for 3–6 months.

• Define target accounts and buyer personas with evidence (industry reports, third-party data, interviews when possible).
• Decide positioning: what unique problem do you solve and for whom? Support with evidence and anticipated objections.
• Choose channel mix and justification (why ABM, content-led, paid search?), expected CAC, LTV assumptions and primary KPI.
• Map how AI-generated assets will be used, adapted or discarded based on strategic fit.

3) Defense & assessment (presentations)

Goal: students demonstrate critical thinking and strategic alignment.

• Present the strategy, show AI outputs, and explain where AI helped and where it failed.
• Panel asks probing questions about assumptions, measurement and ethical trade-offs.

Sample AI prompts for the execution sprint

Include these in the prompt log and require students to report which prompt produced the best output.

• “Write three email subject lines for a mid-market SaaS product targeting IT directors focused on reducing cloud spend. Tone: authoritative, concise. Max 55 characters.”
• “Generate two LinkedIn ad variations for an ABM campaign targeting manufacturing procurement leads. Include headline, body (50–70 words) and CTA.”
• “Draft a 200-word landing page hero + 3 bullet benefits for a cybersecurity service aimed at enterprise legal teams. Emphasize ROI and compliance.”

Rubric: How to grade strategy vs execution

A balanced rubric signals that execution quality matters—but strategy carries extra weight.

• Strategy clarity & insight (35%) — Positioning, persona accuracy, channel rationale, measurement plan.
• Evidence & reasoning (20%) — Use of market data, justified assumptions, risk identification.
• Integration of AI outputs (15%) — How AI artifacts were adapted and critiqued.
• Execution quality (15%) — Copy quality, landing page coherence, creative brief usability.
• Presentation & defense (15%) — Clarity, ability to answer tough questions, peer feedback.

Grading guidance for instructors

Emphasize that AI outputs are expected to be imperfect. Students who can identify weaknesses, explain the trade-offs and propose corrective steps should score highly even if their AI assets aren’t polished.

Common pitfalls — and how to teach students to avoid them

Use recent 2026 guidance and journalism to shape your warnings. For instance, ZDNet in Jan 2026 argued that the “AI paradox”—where humans clean up after AI—can be mitigated with process changes. Here are practical fixes:

• Don’t treat AI as an autopilot: require a prompt log and a verification checklist for all outputs.
• Use human-in-the-loop verification: assign a team member to check facts, citations and tone against the strategy.
• Standardize templates: reduce cleanup time by feeding consistent templates into the model.
• Measure AI ROI: track time saved, error rate and revision hours to show real productivity gains.
• Guard against bias and hallucination: teach students to check for unsupported claims and neutralize leading language.
• Set expectations with stakeholders: show which parts are human-owned and which are AI-assisted.

Assessment: real-world authenticity

Invite industry judges to simulate client pushback. Ask judges to act as a CMO, Procurement Lead or Legal Counsel and pose realistic challenges: budget cuts, compliance questions, or misaligned KPIs. This models the scrutiny B2B marketers face.

Case study example (class-ready)

Brief: A mid-market SaaS startup selling finance automation to corporate FP&A teams. Objective: 12-month pipeline growth with predictable ARR expansion.

• AI outputs: email sequence for demo signups, two LinkedIn ad variants, hero text for landing page.
• Student strategy: prioritize ABM and educational content for CFO and Head of FP&A; pilot targeted LinkedIn ads to decision-makers; set primary KPI as SQL-to-opportunity conversion rate and target CAC.
• Defense highlights: students explained why broad demand-gen ads wouldn’t work for a complex purchase, used data from industry reports to justify ABM, and mapped the exact moments where AI assets would be A/B tested and improved.

Advanced variations for upper-level courses

• Integrate first-party data: have students build segments and feed sanitized data into RAG systems to improve personalization.
• Ethics module: force a scenario where AI output includes biased language or an unverified claim; students must correct and document the fix.
• Metrics labs: students run experiments with live campaigns (if partners available) and present learning loops and optimization plans.

Skills students leave with

• Critical thinking: assess AI outputs against strategic imperatives.
• Practical AI fluency: writing effective prompts, maintaining prompt logs and applying guardrails.
• Data-informed strategy: create measurement plans and defend assumptions with evidence.
• Stakeholder communication: present and justify strategy to skeptical stakeholders.

Instructor tips for success

• Model the workflow—show a live demo where AI generates copy and you critique it from a strategic lens.
• Keep briefs narrow—complex briefs lead students to outsource decision-making to AI.
• Prioritize defense over polish—what students say about their choices reveals learning.
• Use real metrics—ask teams to estimate cost per lead and conversion so strategy includes economics, not just creative ideas.

Final thoughts: teaching strategy in an AI-first world

By 2026, the market expects marketers to be fluent with AI for execution. But the competitive advantage belongs to those who can ask the right questions, diagnose trade-offs and design measurable strategies. This lesson plan teaches exactly that: use AI for speed, and keep strategy human-centered.

If you want one quick takeaway to implement tomorrow: require a prompt log + a 1-page human strategy memo for every AI-assisted deliverable. The log proves process; the memo proves thought. Together they teach students the discipline B2B marketers need now.

Call to action

Ready to run this module? Download the free class kit with briefs, rubrics, prompt templates and guest-judge scripts at LiveAndExcel.com/AI-strategy-kit. Try it in a 3-week module and share results—your students’ defenses will tell you what matters most in modern marketing education.

Related Reading

• Why First‑Party Data Won’t Save Everything: An Identity Strategy Playbook for 2026
• Observability & Cost Control for Content Platforms: A 2026 Playbook
• Next‑Gen Programmatic Partnerships: Deal Structures, Attribution & Seller‑Led Growth (2026)
• Strip the Fat: A One-Page Stack Audit to Kill Underused Tools and Cut Costs
• Story‑Led Launches: How Creators Use Emotional AOV to Supercharge Hype Drops in 2026
• Score the Best Flash Sales: A Weekly Roundup Strategy for Value Shoppers
• Remote Work in Croatia: When to Quit Your Job and Move to a Seaside Town
• World Cup 2026 for International Fans: Visa, Ticket and Travel Checklist
• How to Track Content Moving Between Disney+, Hulu, and Other Services in EMEA
• What to Watch for in Long‑Term Valet Contracts: The Fine Print That Costs You